All queries

Question

How do trading strategies behave under liquidity stress?

Per-strategy bucket scores under the LIQUIDITY_STRESS failure mode (deep drawdown with elevated, persistent volatility).

Short answer

Strategies score across a wide range in the liquidity stress bucket — top 78/100 (RSI with SMA 200 Trend Filter), bottom 39 (Buy and Hold Bitcoin). 4 of 13 strategies have this bucket augmented from a-priori tags (Phase 18d).

liquidity stress bucket scores

StrategyAssetLIQUIDITY_STRESS scoren augmentedOverall score
RSI with SMA 200 Trend FilterSPY78.3 / 100075 / 100
Supertrend StrategySPY65.8 / 100058 / 100
MACD + RSI Confirmation (BTC)BTC45.7 / 1005249 / 100
MACD Signal Line CrossoverSPY45.6 / 100055 / 100
EMA 12/26 CrossoverSPY45.2 / 100052 / 100
SMA 200 Trend Following (GOLD)GOLD45.1 / 100051 / 100
SMA 200 CrossoverSPY44.1 / 100054 / 100
Bollinger Band BounceSPY44.0 / 100053 / 100
EMA 12/26 Crossover (BTC)BTC43.9 / 1005250 / 100
RSI 30/70 Mean Reversion (BTC)BTC43.7 / 1005251 / 100
RSI 30/70 Mean ReversionSPY40.5 / 100050 / 100
Buy and Hold S&P 500SPY40.4 / 100054 / 100
Buy and Hold BitcoinBTC39.3 / 1005253 / 100

Bucket scores are computed on replicas ex-post-classified into the LIQUIDITY_STRESS bucket via operational gating definitions; when bucket-n < 5 the bucket is augmented with a-priori-tagged replicas (Phase 18d). 0–100; higher = better behaviour under this stress condition.

Related strategy reports

Related failure-mode definitions

Related questions

Data is sourced from the curated case set: 31 empirical anchors + 32 synthetic stress probes across 9 score buckets, V2 per-FM-bucket scoring with a-priori augmentation. See /methodology.

Programmatic access: POST /api/v1/agent/analyze · GET /api/v1/catalog/query · see /interop.